Skip to content
LinkedInX

Evaluating AI Agents

Target audience: Those unsure how to measure agent quality, those finding final output alone insufficient
Prerequisites: Basic understanding of What Is AI Evaluation and What Is an AI Agent

Evaluating an AI agent differs from evaluating a single response. The path to the result matters alongside the result itself.

Why Output Alone Is Not Enough

An agent reaches its result through several steps. A correct final output produced by a flawed path will not reproduce.

SituationFinal outputPathAssessment
IdealCorrectRight tools, minimal stepsGood
Accidental successCorrectWrong tools tried repeatedlyLow reproducibility
Near missWrongSound procedure, one bad stepEasy to fix
This table scrolls horizontally. Keyboard users can focus the table and use the left and right arrow keys.

The second case may well fail next time under identical conditions. Looking only at output hides that difference.

Evaluate the Trajectory

A trajectory is the record of the steps an agent took. Evaluate it along these lines.

AspectWhat to look at
Tool selectionWere the right tools chosen, without wasted calls
OrderWere prerequisite steps skipped
Step countCould the same result come from fewer steps
RetriesWas the same failure repeated
Stopping decisionsWere approval-required operations correctly held
This table scrolls horizontally. Keyboard users can focus the table and use the left and right arrow keys.

Trajectory records come from automatic logging through hooks.

Common Metrics

MetricDescription
Task success rateShare of runs meeting the completion condition
Step efficiencySteps and tool calls needed to finish
SafetyShare of approval-required operations correctly held
Recovery rateShare of failures the agent resolved on its own
This table scrolls horizontally. Keyboard users can focus the table and use the left and right arrow keys.

Do not collapse these into a single number. Optimizing success rate alone tends to inflate step count and cost.

Build a Task Set

Agent evaluation needs a reproducible set of tasks with known correct outcomes.

  • Extract representative cases from real work
  • Always include cases that failed previously
  • State completion conditions in a form that can be checked mechanically

Including past failures matters most: it reveals whether an intended improvement quietly reintroduced an old problem.

Summary

  • Agent evaluation covers the execution trajectory, not just the final output
  • Accidental and reproducible successes are indistinguishable from output alone
  • Evaluate tool selection, order, step count, retries, and stopping decisions
  • Maintain a reproducible task set that includes past failure cases
Quiz